Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20250119071622/https://github.blog/changelog/2025-01-17-updating-retention-period-for-last_activity_at-values-on-the-user-management-api-public-preview-to-90-days/
Starting Tuesday, February 18th, 2025, we will be updating our retention policy so that the last_activity_at field will only be actively stored by GitHub for 90 days. Previously, this contents of this field were retained indefinitely.
What’s Changing
Old Policy: Unlimited retention of the last_activity_at value.
New Policy: A rolling 90-day retention period. If your data’s last_activity_at exceeds 90 days, its value will be set to nil.
Expected Impact
The vast majority of our users will see little or no impact because the last_activity_at field should always display the most recent activity date.
Only users with no new activity within a 90-day window will have their last_activity_at value replaced by nil. In practice this means that on the changeover date, users whose last activity with Copilot took place prior to 11/20/2024 will have the value for their last_activity_at replaced on a rolling-forward basis.
Detail
Clarifying the behavior of last_activity_at in the context of the current changes:
Assigning a Seat: When you assign a seat to a user, the last_activity value for that seat will be nil until the user interacts with it for the first time. This is true even if the user had previous activity from a different seat assignment in another organization.
Removing a Seat: When you remove a seat from a user, the last_activity data for that user is set to nil in the revoking org. Their data is unaffected for other admins who have granted that user a seat in other orgs, when pulled for those orgs.
Reassigning a User to Seat: If you remove a seat from a user and later assign a new seat to the same user, the last_activity value for the new seat will again be nil until the user’s next interaction, regardless of whether the seat was previously assigned to them.
Deleting a User: If you delete a user, all associated last_activity data for that user is immediately deleted.
Determining Dormancy: When retrieving activity data for a seat, you can use the created_at and last_activity values to determine dormancy. For example, if created_at is more than 30 days ago and last_activity is either more than 30 days ago or nil, the seat may considered dormant.
Activity Data for Assigned Seats: When retrieving last_activity data for assigned seats, you will receive a nil value if the assignee’s most recent activity record is older than 90 days.
Note: Behavior of the data will remain consistent with the Activity Report, available in Admin UI.
Why We’re Making This Change
Our external data surfaces must be quality first. Retaining data of this volume for multi-year retention periods increases storage and backup overhead significantly, as well as the cost and complexity of quality checks. A time-bound retention policy allows us to maintain efficiency while still offering relevant, up-to-date information. This will allow us to further improve the resilience of the data that is returned by the endpoint, while limiting the impact only to very old records.
Next Steps
You don’t need to take any action if you rely on the last_activity_at field for current activity records.
However, if for any reason you have workflows or reports that depend on usage dates for active seats that have been dormant for 90 or more days, please be aware that these values will become nil for records older than 90 days, for dates on or before November 20th, 2024, as of Tuesday, February 18th, 2025. While exceptionally rare, we encourage you to store API responses for cases where this will become problematic.
✕
Wait! Don't Go Yet 🚀
Get our FREE eBook "10 Programming Tips That Changed Everything" when you subscribe!
A setup user is responsible for configuring an identity provider for any new Enterprise Managed User (EMU) enterprise account. After your first login to this user account, we strongly recommend you setup 2FA in addition to saving your enterprise recovery codes.
All subsequent login attempts for the setup user account will require a successful 2FA challenge response or the use of an enterprise recovery code to complete authentication. If you do not at least save your enterprise recovery codes, you will be locked out of the account.
GitHub Marketplace will be deprecating the “Featured Customers” section from app listing pages. This change will not cause any breaking changes. Here’s what publishers need to know:
Timeline:
January 27, 2025: Featured Customers sections will no longer be visible on public Marketplace listings
March 3, 2025: The Featured Customers section in publisher dashboards will be completely removed
Publishers can continue showcasing customer success stories directly in their app listing descriptions. However, GitHub will not review or approve customer lists provided in listing descriptions. Publishers are responsible for:
Obtaining explicit permission from customers before featuring them
Ensuring all customer usage claims are accurate and truthful
If a customer reports that they are falsely listed as a user of an app/extension, GitHub may review the authenticity of these claims. Listings found to be making false claims about customer usage will be notified, and may be removed from GitHub Marketplace.
Publishers with existing Featured Customers sections should save this information from the publisher settings before March 3rd if they wish to migrate it to their listing description.
This change helps streamline the Marketplace experience and aligns with our ongoing improvements to listing pages.
✕
Wait! Don't Go Yet 🚀
Get our FREE eBook "10 Programming Tips That Changed Everything" when you subscribe!