On 9/28/2015 3:38 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 9/28/2015 10:24 AM, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas wrote:
>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 09:47, Sven R. Kunze
>> <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:
> <snip>
>>>> I wouldn't make a mountain out of a molehill. Other existing
>>> operators have the same issue.
>>>> Which other keywords or symbols may be either a binary operator or
>> part of a ternary operator depending on context?
>> These come to mind:
>> a = b = c
> a < b < c
These are chained comparisons, which get separated, not ternary
operators. a < b = c < e > f in g is also syntactically valid, and I
don't think anything is gained by calling it a pentanary operator.
--
Terry Jan Reedy